Washington State Sure Looks Pretty From Space

You’d be forgiven for thinking that this was a beautifully textured piece of modern art—but you’d be wrong. It is in fact a view of the rolling hills of farmland in the northwest United States, pictured by the Korea Aerospace Research Institute’s Kompsat-2 satellite.

Snapped over Washington state, the image above shows Columbia County in all its glory. The full image—which you can see by clicking on the image below—also includes Walla Walla county to the south and west. If you look at the image closely, you can make out the swirling patterns in vegetation, created by the ploughs that tend the earth of this lush, crop-producing part of the world. [ESA]

Image by ESA

Washington State Sure Looks Pretty From Space

 SOURCE: GIZMODO

Nasa Explains What Exploded Over Russia

Remember this post about 2012 DA14 that squeaked by Earth?  NASA has put together a video that shows how they figured out what exploded over Russia the same day was a coincidence.

The Aqua-Wing?

I’m an early adopter of most things.  I embrace change… But I can’t find one reason to think this is the future of either free-diving, or scuba diving.  The concept here falls flat.  It’s French designer seemed to focus entirely on aesthetics, VS function.

This video sort of reminds me of the very edited, multi take free-dive video of Dean’s Blue Hole…

Oceanwings

Here is the Dean’s Blue Hole video I mentioned above:  I call it “fake” because it was shot with multiple takes, and not on one breath.

Have a Good Laugh

Let’s see if you’re paying attention.

Go to this website for Black Acre Brewing Company.  When you get the age verification, click on “I am under 21″  Sit back, and enjoy the show.  What a great way to throw a cool Easter Egg into their website!

Black Acre Brewing Company

Have you seen any similar use of humor?  Let me know!

 

Can Sea Urchins Save the Planet?

The humble sea urchin could hold the key to turning harmful greenhouse gas carbon dioxide into chalk on an industrial scale, British scientists have revealed.

sea urchin

Wikimedia Commons

The Echinus melo or water melon sea urchin

Source

At the moment, pilot studies for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) systems propose the removal of CO2 by pumping it into holes deep underground, but it is both costly and has a long term risk of the gas leaking back out – possibly many miles away from the original downward source.

But now scientists have discovered that sea urchins use nickel ions to harness carbon dioxide from the sea to grow their exoskeleton – or shell. It could be a way to capture tonnes of CO2.

Using the nickel nanoparticles suspended in water vats at factories, power stations would capture the CO2 as it is pumped through, converting the gas into the chalk.

The nickel catalyst can be recycled and the by-product – the carbonate – is useful and not damaging to the environment.

Physicist Dr Lidija Siller, a PHD student at Newcastle University, discoverd the nickel enzyme by chance.

“We had set out to understand in detail the carbonic acid reaction – which is what happens when CO2 reacts with water – and needed a catalyst to speed up the process.

“At the same time, I was looking at how organisms absorb CO2 into their skeletons and in particular the sea urchin which converts the CO2 to calcium carbonate.

“When we analysed the surface of the urchin larvae we found a high concentration of nickel on their exoskeleton. Taking nickel nanoparticles which have a large surface area, we added them to our carbonic acid test and the result was the complete removal of CO2.”

Each year, humans emit on average 33.4 billion metric tons of CO2 – around 45% of which remains in the atmosphere. Typically, a petrol-driven car will produce a ton of CO2 every 4,000 miles.

Chalk, found in the shells of marine organisms, snails, pearls, and eggshells, is a completely stable mineral, widely used in the building industry to make cement and other materials and also in hospitals to make plaster casts.

The process developed by the Newcastle team involves passing the waste gas directly from the chimney top, through a water column rich in nickel nano-particles and recovering the solid calcium carbonate from the bottom.

Dr Siller adds: “The capture and removal of CO2 from our atmosphere is one of the most pressing dilemmas of our time.

“Our process would not work in every situation – it couldn’t be fitted to the back of a car, for example – but it is an effective, cheap solution that could be available world-wide to some of our most polluting industries and have a significant impact on the reduction of atmospheric CO2.”

The team have patented the process and are now looking for an investor to take it forward.

This findings are published in the academic journal Catalysis Science & Technology.

Read more: Here

We just squeaked by next Friday

We will have a decent size asteroid sweep by Earth next Friday.  It’s estimated that the flyby will come 14,000 miles from Earth.  For reference, geosynchronous satellites can be in the neighborhood of 22,000 to 24,000 miles.   Yikes!

From EarthSky

Asteroid 2012 DA14 to sweep close on February 15, 2013

Asteroid 2012 DA14 on February 15, 2012

Asteroid 2012 DA14 on February 15, 2012
It’ll pass within the moon’s distance from Earth – closer than the orbits of geosynchronous satellites. But it won’t strike us in 2013.

A near-Earth asteroid – called 2012 DA14 by astronomers – will pass very close to Earth on February 15, 2013. Astronomers estimate that, when it’s closest to us, it’ll be within the orbit of the moon (which is about 240,000 miles away), and within the orbits of geosynchronous satellites (about 26,000 miles up). 2012 DA14 will be about 21,000 miles (35,000 kilometers) away. It will not strike Earth in 2013. Astronomers’ calculations of asteroid orbits can be trusted. After all, even decades ago, they knew enough about calculating orbits to send people to the moon and bring them safely back, and today we are able place our space vehicles in orbit around objects as small as asteroids.

So, no, 2012 DA14 won’t strike us in 2013. There was a remote possibility it might strike us in 2020, but that possibility has been ruled out also.

Asteroid 2012 DA14 will pass closest on February 15, 2013. As the image above shows, it will pass much closer than the orbit of the moon – closer even that orbiting geosynchronous satellites (22,000 miles). View larger. Image Credit: NASA

What will happen when Asteroid 2012 DA14 passes closely in 2013?

What will happen when it passes us? The short answer is … nothing. On the day it passes, most of us won’t see it or be aware of its passage, in any way. The asteroid won’t alter the tides. It won’t cause volcanoes. It’ll just sweep closely past us – as millions of asteroids have done throughout Earth’s four-and-a-half-billion-year history – some in your own lifetime.

The asteroid will be within range for small telescopes and solidly mounted binoculars, used by experienced observers who have access to appropriate stars charts. Here’s what NASA says about its visibility:

On [February 15, 2013], the asteroid will travel rapidly from the southern evening sky into the northern morning sky with its closest Earth approach occurring about 19:26 UTC when it will achieve a magnitude of less than seven, which is somewhat fainter than naked eye visibility. About 4 minutes after its Earth close approach, there is a good chance it will pass into the Earth’s shadow for about 18 minutes or so before reappearing from the eclipse. When traveling rapidly into the northern morning sky, 2012 DA14 will quickly fade in brightness.

What do we know about asteroid 2012 DA14?

Asteroid 2012 DA14 is a little guy, compared to some asteroids, although its size has not been pinned down precisely. It is thought to be about 45 meters across (nearly 150 feet across), with an estimated mass of about 130,000 metric tons.

If a space object 150 feet wide were to strike our planet, it wouldn’t be Earth-destroying. But it has been estimated that it would produce the equivalent of 2.4 megatons of TNT. How does that compare with other known impact events on Earth? In 1908, in a remote part of Russia, an explosion killed reindeer and flattened trees. But no crater was ever found. Scientists now believe a small comet struck Earth. That event has been estimated at 3 to 20 megatons. So 2012 DA14 is in the same approximate realm as the Tunguska comet (which, actually, might have been an asteroid instead). It would not destroy Earth, but it could flatten a city.

Of course, about 70% of our world is covered by oceans. That means the most likely landing spot of any incoming asteroid is in the water – not on a city or other populated area.

Astronomers at the Observatorio Astronómico de La Sagra in Spain discovered 2012 DA14 in early 2012. We know 2012 DA14′s orbit is similar to that of Earth. That is one reason the asteroid eluded astronomers until recently. You can be sure that many astronomers are carefully tracking 2012 DA14 now.

The orbit of 2012 DA14 is an inclined ellipse. In other words, it’s tilted sightly with respect to Earth’s orbit around the sun, and, like Earth’s orbit, it’s not circular but elliptical – like a circle that someone sat down on. According to Bad Astronomer Phil Plait, who appears to have used a computer program to look at its orbit:

The asteroid spends most of its time well away from our planet. However, the path of the rock does bring it somewhat close to the Earth twice per orbit, or about every six months. The last time it passed us was on February 16 [2012], when it was about 2.5 million km (1.5 million miles) away, equal to about 6 times the distance to the moon. That’s usually about the scale of these encounters — it misses us by quite a margin.

If we know it will miss us in 2013 and in 2020, why are astronomers still watching? In fact, the orbit of 2012 DA14 is not entirely pinned down, although it is known well enough to say for sure: it will not hit us next year, or in 2020.

But it will come close on February 15, 2013! It should be close enough to catch the attention of virtually everyone on Earth in February 2013, on what’s sure to be a media field day.

Will 2012 DA14 strike Earth in 2020?

No. In March 2012, when a collision between 2012 DA14 and Earth in 2020 was still remotely possible, I asked astronomer Donald Yeomans to clarify the risk. Yeomans is, among other things, manager of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. In March 2012, he told EarthSky that a 2020 collision between Earth and asteroid 2012 DA14 was …

… approximately one chance in 83,000, with additional remote possibilities beyond 2020. However, by far the most likely scenario is that additional observations, especially in 2013, will allow a dramatic reduction in the orbit uncertainties and the complete elimination of the 2020 impact possibility.

It turned out they didn’t have to wait until 2013. By May, 2012, astronomers had ruled out even the remote possibility of a 2020 collision.

Still, 2012 DA14 and asteroids like it are sobering.

Bottom line: The near Earth asteroid 2012 DA14 will have a very close pass near Earth on February 15, 2013. It will sweep approximately 21,000 miles from us – much closer than the moon’s orbit and closer than geosynchronous satellites. It will not strike Earth. Its orbit around the sun can bring it no closer to the Earth’s surface on February 15, 2013 than 3.2 Earth radii.

http://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-2012-da14-will-pass-very-close-to-earth-in-2013

My Gear #4

Cameras

I think most photographers have the same problem I do– traveling with photo gear SUCKS.  I could easily blow my entire elite flyer status allotment of baggage on camera gear alone.  Figuring out how to cram all my photo gear along with dive gear and clothes is a huge challenge.

That said, I’ll travel with 4 cameras for a dive trip.  Here is what I bring:

iPhone 5–  I know, it’s not “really” a camera… But it really is.  The camera on the iPhone 5 isn’t that bad, and it’s fine for a backup.  I always have at least one phone with me, so I always have a camera with me.

Canon 60D– This is my travel DSLR.  I’ll bring 4 lenses for the 60D; 50mm prime 1.4, 85mm prime 1.8, Tokina 10-17mm Fisheye 3.5, and a Tamron 18-270 3.5.  I use the Canon for all of my topside shooting.  Getting a housing for the 60D or the 5D unrealistic for me because of the real estate it takes up in luggage.  I also bring a nice travel tripod, shutter release and kit of filters.

Ikelite/JVC video rig– This is essentially a point and shoot video camera that does 1080p.   In no way is this a professional rig, but its small, light and does a decent job.  The light is nice but being a point and shoot it’s easy to blow out an image.  Overall I’m happy with this camera.  One thing that is cool about this camera is that the camera itself is waterproof up to a few meters.  So if the housing were to leak, the camera has a decent shot of surviving the dive assuming depth/pressure doesn’t force too much into the housing.

Ikelite housing

Canon Powershot/Canon Underwater Housing– Same deal as the JVC video camera and housing.  This camera is a small point and shoot with a small(ish) housing.  Pretty easy to deal with, and does a decent job shooting pictures.  I don’t use a strobe/arm on this camera and the on-camera flash isn’t much to write home about.

Leave a comment and tell me about how you approach your travel photography.